AdvertiseDonate
☰ SectionsNews you can follow.
Prime Media Now · 3499 Blazer Parkway, 3rd Floor, Lexington, KY 40509
News · Europe

Victorian Supreme Court: Prisoners lack statutory right to Vegemite

Justice Claire Harris ruled the ban on the yeast spread is a proportionate measure for prison security, dismissing Andre McKechnie's human rights claim.

By Arjun Shah ·

Illustration for: Victorian Supreme Court: Prisoners lack statutory right to Vegemite
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

Justice Claire Harris dismissed the legal challenge brought by Andre McKechnie, a Victorian prisoner who argued that banning Vegemite in state prisons violated his human rights. The Supreme Court of Victoria ruled on Monday that the corrections department did not infringe upon McKechnie's right to food adequate for his health and wellbeing.

The dispute centers on a policy implemented in 2006 by Corrections Victoria. Authorities listed the salty, yeast-based condiment as contraband due to two specific operational concerns. First, the product interferes with the scent detection capabilities of narcotic dogs. Second, its yeast content creates the potential for prisoners to use it to brew alcohol. The ban remains active in the state's correctional facilities.

McKechnie, who is serving a life sentence for the stabbing murder of property developer Otto Kuhne, filed the lawsuit after prison officials refused to provide him with the spread. He was found guilty in Queensland more than 30 years ago and transferred to a Victorian prison ten years into his sentence. He argued that consuming Vegemite is a core part of his Australian cultural identity.

"Without being able to consume Vegemite, I feel deprived of being able to practise my Australian culture, sad and disconnected from my family and community," McKechnie told the court. He claimed the refusal denied him his human right to enjoy his culture as an Australian citizen. Prison authorities and the commissioner countered that neither the Corrections Act nor the human rights charter guarantees a specific right to consume this particular food item.

Justice Harris acknowledged that Vegemite may be regarded as part of Australian culture and that the human rights charter could extend to certain foods. However, she determined that the prohibition was a proportionate measure. The ban is justified by the state's statutory obligations regarding prison management, security, and the safe custody of prisoners. She stated that the specific refusal to permit McKechnie access to the spread was reasonable.

"It is demonstrably justified by the reasons identified by the (state), which are directly related to the discharge of prison authorities’ statutory obligations," Harris said. The ruling confirms that the ban will remain in place for all Victorian prisoners. The decision aligns Victoria with Queensland, South Australia, and Tasmania, which also restrict the condiment. New South Wales remains the only state that allows Vegemite in its correctional centers.

The brand, first developed in Melbourne in 1923 as a local alternative to Marmite, was acquired by Bega in 2013 from US-based Kraft. It remains a common breakfast item for many Australians, though its taste is widely debated. The court's decision ends the specific legal bid by McKechnie to reverse the state policy.

Source: The Guardian

More News · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get Prime Media Now in your inboxNews you can follow. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Related stories

Get Prime Media Now in your inboxNews you can follow. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.