AdvertiseDonate
☰ SectionsNews you can follow.
Prime Media Now · 3499 Blazer Parkway, 3rd Floor, Lexington, KY 40509
News · National

Epstein Letter Suit: Judge Dismisses Trump's $10 Billion Case

A federal judge in Miami ruled that President Trump failed to prove the Wall Street Journal acted with actual malice in reporting on a birthday album tribute.

By Stefan Kim ·

Illustration for: Epstein Letter Suit: Judge Dismisses Trump's $10 Billion Case
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

President Donald Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and media owner Rupert Murdoch ended on Saturday when U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles dismissed the case. The judge ruled in favor of the defendants, stating that the president failed to demonstrate that the newspaper published false statements with actual malice. This legal standard requires proof that a media outlet knew a story was false or showed a reckless disregard for the truth.

The dispute centers on a story published last year about a sexually suggestive letter and drawing. The Journal reported that the items, which bore Trump’s name, were part of a 2003 birthday album compiled for Jeffrey Epstein’s 50th birthday. The collection was gathered by Ghislaine Maxwell years before Epstein’s first arrest in 2006. Trump denied writing the letter and characterized the reporting as false, malicious, and defamatory.

This is not the first time Judge Gayles has rejected the suit. In April, he dismissed the original complaint but allowed the president to file an amended version. Trump’s team did so in May. In his Saturday ruling, Gayles cited the 1964 Supreme Court decision in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. That landmark ruling established that public figures must prove actual malice to win libel cases, a higher bar than the standard for private individuals.

Gayles wrote that the amended complaint’s allegations regarding malice were conclusory and vague. He noted that several claims were inconsistent with the article itself. The judge also pointed out that the story clearly noted Trump’s denial, telling readers that he decried the letter as a fake. The ruling stated that the lawsuit attempted to manufacture flaws in the investigative reporting.

The dismissal came with prejudice, meaning the case cannot be refiled. This outcome follows a period of heightened legal friction between the administration and news organizations. Beyond the Journal, Trump is involved in litigation with the BBC, The Associated Press, and CNN. The latter group recently sued for restored access after being banished from the White House in mid-September. Trump has frequently labeled these outlets fake news and criticized their journalists in public statements.

Epstein died by suicide in a New York jail cell in August 2019. He was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges at the time. The original lawsuit, filed in federal court in Miami, alleged that the Journal and its reporters knowingly and recklessly published numerous false and disparaging statements. The president claimed these actions caused overwhelming financial and reputational harm.

The judge’s decision stands as a permanent resolution to the specific claims against the Journal and Murdoch. The ruling does not address other pending lawsuits involving different media organizations. The case serves as a recent application of the high legal threshold required for public figures to successfully sue newspapers for libel.

Source: The Hollywood Reporter

More News · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get Prime Media Now in your inboxNews you can follow. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Related stories

Get Prime Media Now in your inboxNews you can follow. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.